New Topic

Who is showing support? [Bodyboards]

  • engelvlerkies
    June 2008
    After reading the SABA 2008 thread, I decided to get this poll going. With a 10 option limit I couldn't get all the companies added, but this I think are the most prominent ones.

Bodyboarding 1,092 views

7 Replies


  • June 2008
    does anyone know whats really happened with steve polinski? is the dude ok, getting a little concerned as hes been so quiet lately and no responses back.
  • ElementreeElementree
    June 2008
    The way that i see it is that out of those 10 brands most do support bodyboarding in some way or another.

    Some contribute through sponsoring contests, most sponsor riders to some degree, some place adverts in sixty40 magazine which helps our mag grow and most importantly - keeps it alive!

    There are however a few of those brands who have been quiet for some time for whatever reason...

    Same old saying...

    If you see that the guys are advertising in the mag or sponsoring events - support them because they are the ones trying to help see this sport develop to reach it's full potential!

    If you don't see a specific companies ads in the mag or never see their name mentioned at any of the comps...then ask a couple of questions...find out why they don't support/contribute towards the industry that they are in and then choose whether or not you would like to support them based on their answer.

    Like i have said before...

    We the customer/buyer have the power...we have the power to help see this sport grow by supporting those that support us - no matter whether you're a Pro or just a guy or girl who likes to have a paddle every now and then...we're all bodyboarders and the future of this industry is undoubtably in our hands!

    Cheers...
    G
  • Jared HoustonJared Houston
    June 2008
    Yeah Mark haven't heard from Steve in a very long time hey?
  • that NINJA kid
    June 2008
    Has anyone else noticed how a certain company will lavish support for a while, especially if they've kinda just arrived on our shores and then they'll die off for a bit and suddenly a new hope will spring up, and a few names will switch sponsors and that'll be the name on the beach for a few months?

    I think it may be difficult for different companies to maintain support, out of sheer corporate policy I guess... I can understand from a board sponsor's point of view when it comes to having to co-sponsor an event with say another board sponsor, it makes no sense... It would effectively mean that as a brand you're admitting that theirs is as good as yours or maybe not being quite so dramatic but it is sharing exposure with competition? If Nike sponsors a rugby team with a home-town stadium, you more than likely won't find any Reebok in there, unless it's on an opposing team's jersey.

    It's difficult when you think of this from their point of view, with the limited events available for sponsoring, the costs involved, and choosing one of these that best represents their brand, sponsoring bodyboarding is a hit and miss affair.
    Bodyboarding being a non-team event, and largely more skills based as opposed to equipment based means that as a company, sponsoring an event means every single competitor which arrives can still arrive with their own different brand board,along with towel, bag, cap, t-shirt and whatever else a sponsor may provide, this means low exposure and the chances of the host sponsor winning decreases, also not the best exposure... If it's costing a brand thousands and theirs no sort of immediate return, I can understand their uneasiness to drop the coin!

    I hate to point out the problems but I have thought about this a fair ammount and I can't figure solutions to some of these problems, just asking questions, posing thoughts... I think if we understand the problems brands in our culture face, we can help them to help us in the long run!

    The one solution I thought of is board companies diversifying and building different brand personalities for their fin and accessory ranges ( ala Science, Viper, Giroll), this would be a lot of work for them but then theoretically it would mean a board company can co-sponsor an event with another brands fins or accesories?
  • lyle
    June 2008
    the brands ive noticed the most are science, nomad, atd and hb. these companies also offer amazing service. ive been in contact with all four companies reps and they are really good!

    ive noticed that rossi used to be in all the old bodyboarding or logic mags advertising, but i dont see him as much in the new sixy40. now i know he still supports the wimpy/rossi pro am but is there any reason i dont see his ads in the new mag??? maybe im blind and overlooked it... sorri if i have.
  • KellyKelly
    June 2008
    lyle wrote:
    ive noticed that rossi used to be in all the old bodyboarding or logic mags advertising, but i dont see him as much in the new sixy40. now i know he still supports the wimpy/rossi pro am but is there any reason i dont see his ads in the new mag??? maybe im blind and overlooked it... sorri if i have.

    Rossi has advertised in all issues of sixty40 and has been great to have the support from a local South African manufacturer.
  • JmoJmo
    June 2008
    Thinking about what Ninja Kid said:

    A lot of the value in a sponsorship comes from the way the contest organisers actually manage the event. Unfortunately bodyboarding in South Africa leans heavily on the generosity of people who are doing tough and time consuming work on these events, just because they have a passion for the sport. This is not an excuse for managing an event badly, but is also understandable/forgivable, since having an event is better than none at all.
    If an event is organised really well then the involved sponsors should really be getting solid coverage such as owning the name of an event (eg. Wimpy/Rossi Pro or Sport Unlimited Cape Classic) as well as great brand exposure on the beach, on the website and in the print media. The sponsors should definitely not clash (eg. 2 board brands) and they will need to pay for that privledge. This exposure should overide any relevence to what gear the individual riders are using in the contest.

    A typical scenario for sponsorship that I've seen in other industries is a sponsor can buy a package deal from the organisers, generally categorised as Bronze, Silver, Gold and Platinum. The event needs a certain amount of cash to run and it will take either 1 platinum sponsor, 2 golds, 4 silvers, or 8 bronze sponsors to cover the event costs. The packages state what the sponsors will get for their money, (eg. platinum owns the name of the event and all branding etc, gold will share the name and branding spaces, silver gets demo space on the beach and logos on tees, and so on) this also creates the agreement between organisers and sponsors that if they don't buy the platinum for whatever amount, then they must be prepared to share the exposure.

    Another point to be made is that it is the responsibility of the organisers to arrange all this coverage beforehand with the relevant media or authorities, the media guys should not be expected to just slap free ads in the mags or website, and likewise, having some ranger pull down the judging tower because its not been approved by local authorities would ruin the exposure opportunities of the sponsors (which also makes you realise why nomadic venues are hard to arrange).

    Moral of the story: its a ball ache to organise these things, so until theres some reason (read money) for someone to do it properly and professionally the SA events are probably not going to compare with the Billabong Pro or some PGA million dollar challenge. And then again, it has to start somewhere, so whoever puts in the effort to run the best event of the year will probably have the least trouble finding money the next year...

    Okay enough from me. :?
  • Post a Reply

    You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Copyright © 2025 Sixty40 Bodyboarding. All rights reserved.