posted by tvanwieringen on Friday, 11 May 2007
The two 12 foot sets after this wave screwed us.
2939 views
| Robert Ransome 21st May 2007 21:02 | |
| 12 foot in ur dreems | |
| Robert Ransome 21st May 2007 21:01 | |
| 12 foot in ur dreems | |
| Marthinus Botha 15th May 2007 21:44 | |
| Yest, 18 - 20ft DEEP SEA swell maybe. That works out to approximately +/- 4ft depending on the swell direction etc.. | |
| Marthinus Botha 15th May 2007 21:44 | |
| Yest, 18 - 20ft DEEP SEE swell maybe. That works out to approximately +/- 4ft depending on the swell direction etc.. | |
![]() | Tim van Wieringen 15th May 2007 19:49 |
| Next big swell ill take some proper pics and give you a better perspective. | |
![]() | Tim van Wieringen 15th May 2007 13:26 |
| This was that 18-20 foot swell on 10 May. | |
| Brother R 14th May 2007 14:05 | |
| Talk A's here that is a piece of sea-weed blobbing around... | |
![]() | Gareth White 13th May 2007 22:15 |
| Nope can't see no guy. Just small black bump-could be a ripple! It's hard to judge because the shot was taken so close to the water-it messes with my perception of size. I've seen shots like that taken in 1 foot shorebreak that portray perfect waves that could be anywhere from 8-10 foot. So i say it's just hard to judge because of the angle used(and the light doesn't help much either)-still not willing to say it's as big as advertised. | |
| Gareth Wheeler 13th May 2007 20:46 | |
| well look at the guy in the top right, theres alittle red arrow pointing to him.... its def not 2-3ft but it aint 10ft either.. | |
![]() | Gareth White 13th May 2007 18:42 |
| 2-3 foot | |
![]() | David Atkins 13th May 2007 17:50 |
| not a chance!!!!!!! 6ft! i saw | |
![]() | Tiaan Kriegler 13th May 2007 12:19 |
| looks 20ft... | |
![]() | Kimon de Greef 13th May 2007 11:59 |
| i'm not | |
| Marthinus Botha 13th May 2007 10:23 | |
| haha.. 12 foot? u sure? | |
| Rider: | ||
| Surfspot: | ||
| Photographer: |