North Beach

by Spy Dude on Tuesday, 20 March 2007
North Beach

I skim peter lambert would go ...

Viewed 5976 times

Comments

raynerRayner Venter
31st July 2009 16:05
biiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiggggggggggggggg barel rayner coming out with biiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiggggggggggggggg invert hahahaha i rated this a 5 coz its foto doctored bt nice try
ThomasThomas Bradley
30th August 2007 23:21
its a rock
ThomasThomas Bradley
30th August 2007 23:18
WHAT THE F@#$%. That S*&@! CRAZY
Spy DudePierre Marqua
4th August 2007 14:15
hahhaha, well there you go. Thats brilliant. But it gave some good debate while it lasted. Like the snow in Plett or the frozen sea in durban, not everything you get via email is real.
Word Kelly.....hahhahahha
KellyKelly Footit
4th August 2007 12:52
Date removed.

This photo has been doctored. Take a look at the suspected original and a clearly suspicious variation.
ronald911Ronald Langeveld
4th August 2007 12:38
Obviously its been photoshoped but if you look at the date, it says 2019. Thats propably due to global warming.
:::Tomas:::Tomas Degenaar
30th July 2007 19:58
LOL, now is it photoshopped or not?
Niklas MartinNiklas Martin
25th July 2007 20:36
holy holy holy
MurphmanEvan Schutte
9th June 2007 18:20
Well Rikus would go!!!!!!!!!!!!!
tvanwieringenTim van Wieringen
12th May 2007 09:36
Damn straight. if u look at the other version of this pic u can see a squashed ship on the top which was chopped of in this pic. and just for coincidence there is a ship in the background on the un photoshopped version just like the shopped version with the squashed ship.
frozenghostBarry Wynne
20th April 2007 12:24
photoshop i reckon - hehehehehe
MarthinusMarthinus Botha
23rd March 2007 14:13
i agree 100% with Mark
Spy DudePierre Marqua
23rd March 2007 09:54
hahhahha... let it be real...
no seriously i showed this to some of my surfer mates from durbs and they said exactly what stu said... the banks wont handle something like that, but then i showed them that other pic that on sixty40, same pier different angle, wave coming down and they started to um and ahh and went maybe its a dbl up, etc etc. So ya, everything just seems pretty inconclusive. My personal opinion, its a bit of both.
MatthewMatthew Botha
23rd March 2007 09:14
fake pic!
Stephan BeckerStephan Becker
22nd March 2007 20:47
Haha...I still want it to be real;)
stubags58Stuart Bradford
22nd March 2007 18:02
this wave has definately been photoshopped, who ever did it just selected the areas that he wanted to distort and used the warp tool to make it crazy. it usually lines up pretty well and its hard to see any joins
richrich
22nd March 2007 16:21
if you look vertically off the corner of the peir and diagonally upwards (where the right of the wave kinda dips in) don't you think you can see some photoshopping skills there? Anyways, there is no way a wave that size would break so close to the peir like that - our banks just wouldn't allow it. . . awesom pic tho. . .
TiaanKTiaan Kriegler
22nd March 2007 15:51
well if its real....pull in! hahaha
JmoJames Moolenschot
22nd March 2007 14:45
Hmm, ok since all the main skiet photogs seem to skiem its not photoshopped then perhaps its not. But then the closest explanation is water on the lens, in which case its still not an accurate shot of the conditions anyway...
Spy DudePierre Marqua
22nd March 2007 12:19
ok.. at first i thought it was a photoshop job too, as i said it was emailed to me. I looked at it for a long time before putting it up here, one.. its not my shot and i dont like putting other peoples work on the net, 2 i wasnt 100% sure if it was real or not.
I even tried to make one of my own using the liquifiy filter in photoshop and well results wernt the same. Kinda what peter B said....
so ya
i just thought it was relevent.
Ahoy
dcmikeMike Dei-Cont
22nd March 2007 11:13
Haha! Oh yeah of little faith! Not chopped. Check the other pics (wavescape) and you'll see hectic off shore spray - that combined with slow shutter speed (it's seriously cloudy) and you have all the makings for the fuzzy right hand side. Still, you wouldn't catch me near such a beast!
florisHafeez Floris
22nd March 2007 11:05
What THE HELL is that!!!
jbsJared Schafer
22nd March 2007 10:50
photochopped.
peterbeePeter Brandt
22nd March 2007 10:08
Not Photoshopped, imho - none of the obvious signs are there, e.g. repeated details, blurred transitions, objects stretched till they make a band of tone... but it does look like some minor lens distortion on the right (cheap-ass camera or moisture, maybe?)
Spy DudePierre Marqua
22nd March 2007 09:39
hahhahha, i got it in an email... if it is photoshoped -- it wasnt me :)
Adam MorleyAdam Morley
22nd March 2007 00:37
Thats fat!!!
JmoJames Moolenschot
21st March 2007 22:09
Spy Dude is trying to pull a fast one on you ou's with his photoshopping skillz... It's ok to airbrush pics of chicks, but fake waves just dont cut it... hahaha
MarthinusMarthinus Botha
21st March 2007 20:06
the right half of the image is definatley inlarged..
MarthinusMarthinus Botha
21st March 2007 20:03
i was thinking the exact same thing... does look to big to be true
adam1Adam Craemer
21st March 2007 15:55
maaaasive double up
SmTSean Tickner
21st March 2007 15:31
I'm sorry, is it just me or does this pic look a little bit "Photoshopped"??? The left of the pic looks all good but then the right hand side looks all stretched and weird?I dunno, maybe it's just me?
hugh grantNathan Wood
21st March 2007 14:15
Golly gosh!!
jbsJared Schafer
21st March 2007 13:35
oh my goodness thats ridiculous!!!
byron777Byron Versfeld
21st March 2007 06:49
thats a big,fat slab.lets see some more pics guys.

About

Surfspot:Durban, Central Kwa-Zulu Natal, South Africa North Beach photos

Rating

Rank #3618
148%

59.22% from 24 votes

Login with Facebook to vote for this photo.

Copyright © 2014 Sixty40 Bodyboarding. All rights reserved.